Pollution vs waste: Difference between revisions
J.williams (talk | contribs) m (1 revision imported) |
2dev>Jmdonev No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Done | [[Category:Done 2018-12-10]] | ||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude>The distinction between '''pollution vs waste''' is subtle. However, there are ways to look at each to distinguish between the two. First, a quick look at the definitions: | ||
*''' | *'''Waste''': substances which are the by-products of a process. Essentially, any unwanted products made in the process of making a wanted, intentional product.<ref name = "oxford">N. Jelley, A dictionary of energy science. Oxford</ref> | ||
*''' | *'''[[Pollution]]''': substances that are deemed harmful to animals and/or the environment<ref name = "oxford"/></onlyinclude> | ||
</onlyinclude> | |||
From the definitions above, waste is fairly general, | From the definitions above, waste is fairly general, no connotation of negative consequences. For any processes in the universe, waste (byproducts) will ''always'' be created. For example, a byproduct of [[hydrocarbon combustion]] is [[carbon dioxide]] which is attributed to the [[greenhouse effect]] and [[global warming]]—clearly a negative example of waste. Water is another byproduct of combustion, that rarely has negative consequences, but it is waste. As a different example, [[oxygen]] is a waste product of [[photosynthesis]], but humans and animals require it to breathe—clearly a positive example of waste. | ||
Waste dependends on perspective. Growing levels of carbon dioxide are increasing the strength of the greenhouse effect, but some concentration of carbon dioxide is needed because plants need it to survive. However, the large amounts that humans release from [[fossil fuel]] use means that carbon dioxide has negative impacts. | |||
Unlike waste, pollution '''always'' means that there are negative consequences. Pollution is defined as the harmful effects of an activity, which is the main difference between pollution and waste. All process create waste, but not all will create pollution. Since not all waste is harmful, not all waste is pollution. When waste is indeed harmful, it would then be classified as pollution. | |||
In summary: | |||
''' | *Pollution is ''always harmful'' and doesn't need to come from a [[pollutant]] | ||
*Waste is ''not always harmful'', but it often times can be, especially when disposed of improperly | |||
*Waste always depends on perspective. If one process deems the substance as useless, for another it may be useful! | |||
Reducing waste often reduces environmental impact, either from the disposal, or from the creation in the first place. This leads to the popularity of alternative disposal methods—like compost, recycling or evening reusing a product—rather than filling landfills. | |||
==For Further Reading== | |||
*[[Pollution]] | |||
*[[Waste]] | |||
*[[Pollutant]] | |||
*[[Photosynthesis]] | |||
*[[Hydrocarbon combustion]] | |||
*Or explore a [[Special:Random|random page]] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Uploaded]] | [[Category:Uploaded]] | ||
Revision as of 18:21, 2 January 2019
The distinction between pollution vs waste is subtle. However, there are ways to look at each to distinguish between the two. First, a quick look at the definitions:
- Waste: substances which are the by-products of a process. Essentially, any unwanted products made in the process of making a wanted, intentional product.[1]
- Pollution: substances that are deemed harmful to animals and/or the environment[1]
From the definitions above, waste is fairly general, no connotation of negative consequences. For any processes in the universe, waste (byproducts) will always be created. For example, a byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion is carbon dioxide which is attributed to the greenhouse effect and global warming—clearly a negative example of waste. Water is another byproduct of combustion, that rarely has negative consequences, but it is waste. As a different example, oxygen is a waste product of photosynthesis, but humans and animals require it to breathe—clearly a positive example of waste. Waste dependends on perspective. Growing levels of carbon dioxide are increasing the strength of the greenhouse effect, but some concentration of carbon dioxide is needed because plants need it to survive. However, the large amounts that humans release from fossil fuel use means that carbon dioxide has negative impacts.
Unlike waste, pollution 'always means that there are negative consequences. Pollution is defined as the harmful effects of an activity, which is the main difference between pollution and waste. All process create waste, but not all will create pollution. Since not all waste is harmful, not all waste is pollution. When waste is indeed harmful, it would then be classified as pollution.
In summary:
- Pollution is always harmful and doesn't need to come from a pollutant
- Waste is not always harmful, but it often times can be, especially when disposed of improperly
- Waste always depends on perspective. If one process deems the substance as useless, for another it may be useful!
Reducing waste often reduces environmental impact, either from the disposal, or from the creation in the first place. This leads to the popularity of alternative disposal methods—like compost, recycling or evening reusing a product—rather than filling landfills.
For Further Reading
- Pollution
- Waste
- Pollutant
- Photosynthesis
- Hydrocarbon combustion
- Or explore a random page