Cogeneration: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (1 revision imported)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[category:371 topics]]
[[category:371 topics]]
[[Category:Done 2015-09-05]]
[[Category:Done 2018-05-18]]  
[[File:Cogen.png|400px|thumbnail|Figure 1: A cogeneration cycle makes use of the waste heat generated by a thermodynamic process in order to heat homes, cars, and other appliances.]]
[[File:Cogen.png|400px|thumbnail|Figure 1: A cogeneration cycle makes use of the waste heat generated by a thermodynamic process in order to heat homes, cars, and other appliances.]]
<onlyinclude>'''Cogeneration''' or combined heat and power (CHP) is the on-site generation of [[electricity]] from [[waste heat]]. When generating electricity from [[coal]], [[natural gas]] or [[nuclear power]] only a fraction of the actual [[energy]] content released during combustion is converted into electricity. The remainder of the energy is lost as [[waste heat]]. In a CHP power plant, this waste heat is recovered for other applications such as [[space heating]] or other industrial processes that require heat.</onlyinclude> Hence, CHP is an efficient process to recover energy that would have otherwise been lost.<ref name=cog>COGEN, ''What is cogeneration?'' [Online], Available: http://www.cogeneurope.eu/what-is-cogeneration_19.html</ref> Due to this increase in efficiency, cogeneration has many [[environment]]al benefits and can be a key factor in reducing [[climate change]].<ref>Code Project, ''Cogeneration Case Studies Handbook'' [Online], Available: http://www.code-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CODE_CS_Handbook_Final.pdf</ref>


<onlyinclude>'''Cogeneration''' or combined heat and power (CHP) is the on-site generation of [[electricity]] and useful [[heat]]. When generating electricity from [[coal]], [[natural gas]] or [[nuclear power]] only a fraction of the actual [[energy]] content released during combustion is converted into electricity. The remainder of the energy is lost as [[waste heat]]. In a CHP power plant, this waste heat is recovered for other applications such as [[space heating]] or other industrial processes that require heat.</onlyinclude> Hence, CHP is an efficient process to recover energy that would have otherwise been lost.<ref name=cog>COGEN, ''What is cogeneration?'' [Online], Available: http://www.cogeneurope.eu/what-is-cogeneration_19.html</ref> Due to this increase in efficiency, cogeneration has many [[environment]]al benefits and can be a key factor in reducing [[climate change]].<ref>Code Project, ''Cogeneration Case Studies Handbook'' [Online], Available: http://www.code-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CODE_CS_Handbook_Final.pdf</ref>
Cogeneration plants offer large cost savings, providing additional competitiveness for industrial and commercial uses by offering affordable heat for domestic users.<ref name=cog/> They provide clear environmental benefits due to their enhanced conversion of energy and use of waste heat. However, there are many roadblocks in building such plants.<ref>IEA. (2014). ''Linking Heat and Electricity Systems'' [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/LinkingHeatandElectricitySystems.pdf</ref> One factor is the relatively high capital cost associated with such plants, making it unappealing to potential developers. Cogeneration plants are a threat to such companies, and there have been known to be many [http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/03/energy-efficiency-cogeneration-biz-energy_cx_jz_0707efficiency_horror.html legal wranglings] in the development of these plants.<ref>Forbes, ''The Most Efficient Power Plants'' [Online], Available: http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/03/energy-efficiency-cogeneration-biz-energy_cx_jz_0707efficiency_horror.html</ref> In addition, [[distributed generation]] sources of electricity can create [[shock hazard]]s for the power company by electrifying a portion of the [[electrical grid]] that would otherwise be off when the company needs to work on that portion of the grid.


Cogeneration plants offer large cost savings, providing additional competitiveness for industrial and commercial users, and offering affordable heat for domestic users.<ref name=cog/> They provide clear environment benefits due to their enhanced conversion of energy and use of waste heat, however there are many roadblocks in building such plants.<ref>IEA. (2014). ''Linking Heat and Electricity Systems'' [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/LinkingHeatandElectricitySystems.pdf</ref> First of all, the initial start-up costs are relatively high which can ward off many potential developers. The second, and biggest roadblock is utilities and regulators scaring off the building of such projects. Cogeneration plants are a threat to such companies, and there have been known to be many [http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/03/energy-efficiency-cogeneration-biz-energy_cx_jz_0707efficiency_horror.html legal wranglings] in the development of these plants.<ref>Forbes, ''The Most Efficient Power Plants'' [Online], Available: http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/03/energy-efficiency-cogeneration-biz-energy_cx_jz_0707efficiency_horror.html</ref> On the other hand, [[distributed generation]] sources of electricity can create [[shock hazard]]s for the power company by electrifying a portion of the [[electrical grid]] that would otherwise be off when the company needs to work on that portion of the grid.
Since fossil fuels are mainly used as the input source, CHP cannot be considered an ultimately sustainable solution for the long term. However, it can help slow the rate of carbon emissions with substantial energy savings through higher efficiencies in situations where more sustainable options are not available or affordable.<ref>Triple Pundit, ''Combined Heat and Power: Pros and Cons'' [Online], Available: http://www.triplepundit.com/special/energy-options-pros-and-cons/combined-heat-power-pros-cons/</ref>
 
Also, when used with a fossil fuel input source, CHP cannot be considered an ultimately sustainable solution for the long term. However, it can help slow the rate of carbon emissions with substantial energy savings in situations where more sustainable options are not available or affordable.<ref>Triple Pundit, ''Combined Heat and Power: Pros and Cons'' [Online], Available: http://www.triplepundit.com/special/energy-options-pros-and-cons/combined-heat-power-pros-cons/</ref>


A discussion of some of the pros and cons of CHP can be seen on the blog TriplePundit [http://www.triplepundit.com/special/energy-options-pros-and-cons/combined-heat-power-pros-cons/ here].
A discussion of some of the pros and cons of CHP can be seen on the blog TriplePundit [http://www.triplepundit.com/special/energy-options-pros-and-cons/combined-heat-power-pros-cons/ here].
Line 13: Line 12:
== Efficiency ==
== Efficiency ==


Traditionally, homes are heated with [[furnace]]s and electricity comes from [[power plant]]s. In [[combustion]]-based energy generation systems (or nuclear systems), whether it is a [[gas turbine]] or a combustion engine, the [[efficiency]] is limited by [[thermodynamics]], and energy is lost as waste heat. The total loss is the sum of the losses in both heat and power generation. Hence, the total efficiency is low.  
Power plants produce roughly twice as much energy as waste heat as electricity. Homes are usually heated with [[furnace]]s and also require [[fuel]] to generate their heat. Diverting some of the waste heat from electricity generation, saves substantial amounts of money and energy.


Producing the equivalent amount of heat and electricity using a CHP system is much more efficient as heat from electricity production can be usefully applied. The total efficiency of a CHP system is then given by the sum of its electrical and thermal efficiency. Only a tiny portion of the heat is unrecoverable, and still lost as waste heat.
Producing the equivalent amount of heat and electricity using a CHP system is much more efficient as heat from electricity production can be usefully applied. The total efficiency of a CHP system is given by the total energy used, both electrical and heat energy, divided by the energy going in. A much smaller portion of the heat is unrecoverable, and still lost as waste heat.


[[File:CHPefficiency.png|800px|center|thumbnail|Figure 2: Energy flow chart comparing the efficiency of separate generation and cogeneration. Data for efficiency, heat and energy demand is exemplary.<ref> Agert, Prof. Dr. Carsten, ''Energy Storage Lecture 4, Storing heat instead of electricity,'' unpublished. </ref> Green arrows are associated with useful energy, black ones with losses.]]
[[File:CHPefficiency.png|800px|center|thumbnail|Figure 2: Energy flow chart comparing the efficiency of separate generation and cogeneration. Data for efficiency, heat and energy demand is exemplary.<ref> Agert, Prof. Dr. Carsten, ''Energy Storage Lecture 4, Storing heat instead of electricity,'' unpublished. </ref> Green arrows are associated with useful energy, black ones with losses.]]


=== Efficiency calculations ===
=== Efficiency calculations ===
A household has a specific thermal energy demand <m>Q_{th}</m>, and a [[power]] demand <m>W_{el}</m>. The CHP has a [[thermal efficiency]] <m>\eta_{th}</m>, and an electrical efficiency <m>\eta_{el}</m>. Due to combined generation, the CHP efficiency is the sum of these efficiencies <m>\eta_{CHP}=\eta_{th} + \eta_{el}</m>, where the total fuel needed to meet the house's needs is <m>Q_{fuel,CHP}= \frac{Q_{th} + W_{el}}{\eta_{CHP}} </m>. Due to the much higher efficiency of <m>\eta_{CHP}</m> compared to a household not using CHP, the amount of fuel needed to meet its energy needs is much less. For example if a house using CHP has an efficiency of 90%, compared to a house running at 30% efficiency, it will only need to use 1/3 the amount of fuel to fulfill its needs!<ref><m>\frac{Q_{fuel,CHP}}{Q_{fuel,non-CHP}}=\frac{30\%}{90\%}=\frac{1}{3}</m></ref>
A household has a specific thermal energy demand <math>Q_{th}</math>, and a [[power]] demand <math>W_{el}</math>. The CHP has a [[thermal efficiency]] <math>\eta_{th}</math>, and an electrical efficiency <math>\eta_{el}</math>. Due to combined generation, the CHP efficiency is the sum of these efficiencies <math>\eta_{CHP}=\eta_{th} + \eta_{el}</math>, where the total fuel needed to meet the house's needs is <math>Q_{fuel,CHP}= \frac{Q_{th} + W_{el}}{\eta_{CHP}} </math>. Due to the much higher efficiency of <math>\eta_{CHP}</math> compared to a household not using CHP, the amount of fuel needed to meet its energy needs is much less. For example, if a house using CHP has an efficiency of 90%, comparatively it will only use 1/3 of the fuel that a house running at 30% efficiency would!<ref><math>\frac{Q_{fuel,CHP}}{Q_{fuel,non-CHP}}=\frac{30\%}{90\%}=\frac{1}{3}</math></ref>


== Types ==
== Types ==
[[File:ResidentialCHP.jpeg|400px|thumbnail|Schematic view on a grid-connected residential cogeneration generation unit<ref>Oakland University. (2013) ''Energy System Applications & Integration Lab (ESAIL)''. [Online]. Available: http://www.oakland.edu/ESAIL.</ref>]]
[[File:ResidentialCHP.jpeg|400px|thumbnail|Schematic view on a grid-connected residential cogeneration generation unit<ref>Oakland University. (2013) ''Energy System Applications & Integration Lab (ESAIL)''. [Online]. Available: http://www.oakland.edu/ESAIL.</ref>]]


For cogeneration units, first of all it is distinguished between the system size based on its electrical output. Typically Micro-CHP will output less than 5 kilowatt ([[kW]]) while Mini-CHP will be greater than 5 kW and less than 500 kW. Micro-CHP systems are usually installed in homes and are heat demand controlled. This means that they turn on when there is a need for heat to produce the by-product heat while generating electricity.
The electrical output needed will contribute to the system size of the cogeneration unit. Typically, Micro-CHP will output less than 5 kilowatt ([[kW]]) while Mini-CHP will be greater than 5 kW and less than 500 kW. Micro-CHP systems are usually installed in homes and are heat demand controlled. This means that they turn on when there is a need for heat to produce the by-product heat while generating electricity.


The different types of Micro-CHP systems include for example:
The different types of Micro-CHP systems include for example:
Line 39: Line 38:
Areas of interest addressing this issue include heat storage which may effectively make the CHP become electricity demand controlled instead of heat demand controlled. The system would generate electricity as required by the grid and store excess heat for use at another time.
Areas of interest addressing this issue include heat storage which may effectively make the CHP become electricity demand controlled instead of heat demand controlled. The system would generate electricity as required by the grid and store excess heat for use at another time.


To learn more about the benefits and applications of CHP, visit the EPA's [http://www.epa.gov/chp/basic/index.html information page].
== For Further Reading ==
For further information please see the related pages below:
*[[Heat engine]]
*[[Waste heat]]
*[[Second law of thermodynamics]]
*Or explore a [[Special:Random|random page]]


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Uploaded]]
[[Category:Uploaded]]

Latest revision as of 22:53, 18 May 2018

Figure 1: A cogeneration cycle makes use of the waste heat generated by a thermodynamic process in order to heat homes, cars, and other appliances.

Cogeneration or combined heat and power (CHP) is the on-site generation of electricity from waste heat. When generating electricity from coal, natural gas or nuclear power only a fraction of the actual energy content released during combustion is converted into electricity. The remainder of the energy is lost as waste heat. In a CHP power plant, this waste heat is recovered for other applications such as space heating or other industrial processes that require heat. Hence, CHP is an efficient process to recover energy that would have otherwise been lost.[1] Due to this increase in efficiency, cogeneration has many environmental benefits and can be a key factor in reducing climate change.[2]

Cogeneration plants offer large cost savings, providing additional competitiveness for industrial and commercial uses by offering affordable heat for domestic users.[1] They provide clear environmental benefits due to their enhanced conversion of energy and use of waste heat. However, there are many roadblocks in building such plants.[3] One factor is the relatively high capital cost associated with such plants, making it unappealing to potential developers. Cogeneration plants are a threat to such companies, and there have been known to be many legal wranglings in the development of these plants.[4] In addition, distributed generation sources of electricity can create shock hazards for the power company by electrifying a portion of the electrical grid that would otherwise be off when the company needs to work on that portion of the grid.

Since fossil fuels are mainly used as the input source, CHP cannot be considered an ultimately sustainable solution for the long term. However, it can help slow the rate of carbon emissions with substantial energy savings through higher efficiencies in situations where more sustainable options are not available or affordable.[5]

A discussion of some of the pros and cons of CHP can be seen on the blog TriplePundit here.

Efficiency

Power plants produce roughly twice as much energy as waste heat as electricity. Homes are usually heated with furnaces and also require fuel to generate their heat. Diverting some of the waste heat from electricity generation, saves substantial amounts of money and energy.

Producing the equivalent amount of heat and electricity using a CHP system is much more efficient as heat from electricity production can be usefully applied. The total efficiency of a CHP system is given by the total energy used, both electrical and heat energy, divided by the energy going in. A much smaller portion of the heat is unrecoverable, and still lost as waste heat.

Figure 2: Energy flow chart comparing the efficiency of separate generation and cogeneration. Data for efficiency, heat and energy demand is exemplary.[6] Green arrows are associated with useful energy, black ones with losses.

Efficiency calculations

A household has a specific thermal energy demand [math]Q_{th}[/math], and a power demand [math]W_{el}[/math]. The CHP has a thermal efficiency [math]\eta_{th}[/math], and an electrical efficiency [math]\eta_{el}[/math]. Due to combined generation, the CHP efficiency is the sum of these efficiencies [math]\eta_{CHP}=\eta_{th} + \eta_{el}[/math], where the total fuel needed to meet the house's needs is [math]Q_{fuel,CHP}= \frac{Q_{th} + W_{el}}{\eta_{CHP}} [/math]. Due to the much higher efficiency of [math]\eta_{CHP}[/math] compared to a household not using CHP, the amount of fuel needed to meet its energy needs is much less. For example, if a house using CHP has an efficiency of 90%, comparatively it will only use 1/3 of the fuel that a house running at 30% efficiency would![7]

Types

Schematic view on a grid-connected residential cogeneration generation unit[8]

The electrical output needed will contribute to the system size of the cogeneration unit. Typically, Micro-CHP will output less than 5 kilowatt (kW) while Mini-CHP will be greater than 5 kW and less than 500 kW. Micro-CHP systems are usually installed in homes and are heat demand controlled. This means that they turn on when there is a need for heat to produce the by-product heat while generating electricity.

The different types of Micro-CHP systems include for example:

Integrating CHP in the electricity grid

To integrate a CHP system onto the grid, it must first be connected to an inverter to convert DC electricity to AC electricity. This allows the generated electricity to be used by others on the grid. A high penetration rate of micro-CHP systems in homes has the potential to cause instabilities to the electrical grid. This is due to the difficulty in forecasting when these systems will generate electricity as they must be producing heat in the home in order to obtain the electricity required for the load. At peak hours when the electricity consumption is high, there is a greater need for additional electricity on the electric grid than in off-peak hours. Areas of interest addressing this issue include heat storage which may effectively make the CHP become electricity demand controlled instead of heat demand controlled. The system would generate electricity as required by the grid and store excess heat for use at another time.

For Further Reading

For further information please see the related pages below:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 COGEN, What is cogeneration? [Online], Available: http://www.cogeneurope.eu/what-is-cogeneration_19.html
  2. Code Project, Cogeneration Case Studies Handbook [Online], Available: http://www.code-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CODE_CS_Handbook_Final.pdf
  3. IEA. (2014). Linking Heat and Electricity Systems [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/LinkingHeatandElectricitySystems.pdf
  4. Forbes, The Most Efficient Power Plants [Online], Available: http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/03/energy-efficiency-cogeneration-biz-energy_cx_jz_0707efficiency_horror.html
  5. Triple Pundit, Combined Heat and Power: Pros and Cons [Online], Available: http://www.triplepundit.com/special/energy-options-pros-and-cons/combined-heat-power-pros-cons/
  6. Agert, Prof. Dr. Carsten, Energy Storage Lecture 4, Storing heat instead of electricity, unpublished.
  7. [math]\frac{Q_{fuel,CHP}}{Q_{fuel,non-CHP}}=\frac{30\%}{90\%}=\frac{1}{3}[/math]
  8. Oakland University. (2013) Energy System Applications & Integration Lab (ESAIL). [Online]. Available: http://www.oakland.edu/ESAIL.