Fuel vs flow

Different types of primary energy fall into two main categories: fuels and flows. Fuels like coal, natural gas, and uranium are dense stores of energy that are consumed when used. Flows are natural processes that have energy associated with movement. Using a flow means harnessing energy that comes from this movement like wind and tides.[1] Once the energy is extracted from a fuel, it's gone, but extracting the energy from a flow is different. Natural processes put energy back into flows over time making them renewable.

Fuel

Most of the world's primary energy (90-95%) comes from fuels (see Figure 1). Of these primary fuels like coal and natural gas are put into power plants. Crude oil is processed into secondary fuels, like gasoline, diesel and kerosene. Most cars are propelled by igniting a fuel like gasoline or diesel. Coal, natural gas, gasoline, and diesel are all considered to be fuels, because the energy we take from them is stored discretely inside them, and once we use it up, the fuel is gone. Fuels are dispatchable, which means the energy is available whenever it is needed.

Flow

Power sources like hydroelectricity, tidal power, wind power, and solar power take advantage of energy flows, where energy is harnessed from natural energy sources. An energy flow differs from a fuel because an energy flow is simply a movement of energy from one place to another, whereas a fuel is a substance that stores energy.

Why it matters

Both fuels and flows can be sustainable, but for the most part, only flows are renewable. For a discussion of why this distinction is important please see renewable and sustainable energy.

Public perceptions of these fuels and flows are complex, but the science is clear: each fuel and flow has its own advantages and drawbacks. Comparing which is the best is not straightforward, and depends on many parameters.

Flows almost always have fewer emissions and pollution than fuels (although nuclear fuels lead to very few emissions). This is especially true of the CO2 footprint, which has led to aggressive pursuit of flows, especially by environmental groups. While there is usually no direct waste from flow harvesting technologies life cycle analysis often shows that there is waste that should be taken into consideration. The carbon dioxide released from harvesting flows is almost always quite a bit less (greenhouse gases from hydroelectricity are a problem, and in theory it's possible to capture and sequester carbon dioxide from fossil fuel plants. Although as of 2015 only the |Boundary Dam project in Saskatchewan Canada is actually capturing CO2.

Flows like wind, sunlight and tidal power are non-dispatchable and intermittent, meaning that there is little to no control over when the energy comes. Issues with energy storage make this a difficult challenge to overcome in using flows. Fuels are ready whenever they're needed. For example, both wind and tides have been used for years for sailing ships. The ships go when the flows take them, because "Time and the tide wait for no one."

These flows (although not geothermal) tend to take up a large amount of land, compared to fuel use. Fuels are very dense. Flows are often, but not always more expensive than fuels. While flows have been used for millennia (like daylighting for light in buildings, or milling using hydropower), the technology necessary to get electricity out of flows tends to be harder to build. For example, it’s easier to make a coal-fired power plant than to make a photovoltaic cell. This means that in rapidly developing countries like China, coal is actually growing more rapidly than any of the flows (see world primary energy).

Examples

Flows

Hydroelectricity uses the flow of water to turn turbines, connected to generators, which create electricity. The potential energy put into this system (water evaporating, condensing, flowing in rivers), comes from the sun, hydro power plants harness the kinetic energy of an already-moving system.

Wind power uses wind currents put into motion by the sun, harnessing their kinetic energy to spin turbines, then generators, creating electricity.

Solar power uses the radiation from the sun in order to create electricity. Solar thermal power plants use the heat from the sun to spin turbines, whereas photovoltaic systems convert the energy directly.

Fuels

Petroleum products like gasoline, liquid natural gas, and diesel all are used as fuels to power vehicles.

Coal is a fossil fuel that is burned to create electricity in much of the world. It's currently the fastest growing primary energy source.

Uranium is a nuclear fuel used in reactors to create electricity.

Figure 1. Approximately 95% percent of the primary energy in the world comes from fuels like oil, coal and natural gas[2] (all of which except nuclear fuels produce extensive greenhouse gases when used). Most of the rest of the world's primary energy comes from hydropower, although a small fraction is wind power, solar power, geothermal energy, and tidal power. The amount of electricity that comes from flows increases to about 19% (still mostly hydro) because flows don't have the same limitations of having a thermal efficiency's that heat engines have and flows are used almost entirely for electricity generation.

References

  1. Wolfson, "Earth's Energy Endowment," Energy, Environment, and Climate, Second edition. London, England: Norton, 2012, chapter 1.6
  2. IEA (2014), "World energy balances", IEA World Energy Statistics and Balances (database). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00512-en (Accessed February 2015)

Authors and Editors

Allison Campbell, Jordan Hanania, James Jenden, Jason Donev
Last updated: July 21, 2018
Get Citation